materials and information included in this Latest News page are provided as
a service to you and do not reflect endorsement by the American Honey Producers
Association (AHPA). The content and opinions expressed within the page are
those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by AHPA. AHPA is not
responsible for the accuracy of information provided from outside
Bee Health Honey Survey
The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is seeking public comments on the paperwork and regulatory burdens associated with its information collection on the "... number of colonies, honey production, stocks, prices, and basic economic data from beekeepers in all 50 States. Findings from the expanded Bee and Honey Survey can be paired with results from the Colony Loss program to more wholly describe the economics of beekeeping ..."
Comments Due By: October 23, 2015
Web site: The August 24, 2015 USDA NASS Federal Register Notice is posted at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-08-24/html/2015-20845.htm
Contact: Questions may be directed to R. Renee Picanso who is the Associate Administrator of the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service at 202 720 4333; e-mail: Renee.Picanso@NASS.USDA.gov
* Copies of the Information Collection documents can be obtained without charge from David Hancock, NASS Clearance Officer, at 202 690 2388; e-mail: OMBOfficer@NASS.USDA.gov
The primary objective of the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) is to prepare and issue state and national estimates of crop and livestock production, livestock products, prices, and disposition; as well as economic statistics, environmental statistics related to agriculture, and also to conduct the Census of Agriculture.This request for renewal of the Bee and Honey Survey (0535- 0153) will expand the historic collection to collect additional data to respond to the increased demand for data relating to honey bees.
As pollinators, honey bees are vital to the agricultural industry for producing food for the world's population. Ad hoc surveys showed a dramatic rise in the number of disappearances of honey bee colonies in North America in late 2006; disappearances ranged from 10-15 percent annual colony loss in some areas to greater than 30 percent in other areas. Often called Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), the condition occurs when worker bees from a beehive or a European honey bee colony abruptly disappear, with minimal mortality evident near the hive and an intact queen and food supply readily available. The cost for maintaining and replenishing of honey bee colonies is exacerbated in a climate of higher than expected losses. Further data is needed to accurately describe the costs associated with pest/disease control, wintering fees, and replacement worker and queen bees. The USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in consultation with other relevant Federal partners, are scaling up efforts to address the decline of honey bee health with a goal of ensuring the recovery of this critical subset of pollinators. NASS supports the Pollinator Research Action Plan, published May 19, 2015, which emphasizes the importance of coordinated action to identify the extent and causal factors in honey bee mortality.
NASS will collect Colony Loss data under the OMB approval number 0535-0255. Under the expanded Bee and Honey Survey (0535-0153), NASS will collect information on the number of colonies, honey production, stocks, prices, and basic economic data from beekeepers in all 50 States. Findings from the expanded Bee and Honey Survey can be paired with results from the Colony Loss program to more wholly describe the economics of beekeeping.
The survey will use two questionnaire versions. Operations with five or more colonies will receive the expanded bee and honey questionnaire and operations with less than five colonies will receive a shorter version of the questionnaire. Collecting data from operations with less than five colonies will help better compare their experiences to larger operations. These surveys will provide data needed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and other government agencies to administer programs. State universities and agriculture departments also use the enhanced data from this survey.
Keystone, Colorado, August 10, 2015
Honey Bee Health Coalition Releases Guide to Help Beekeepers Detect, Control Varroa Mite Infestations
Guide Equips Beekeepers of All Types with Tools to Tackle Parasite, Strengthen Hive Health
The Honey Bee Health Coalition, a diverse coalition dedicated to improving the health of honey bees and other pollinators, released a guide today aimed at helping beekeepers strengthen hive health by controlling the Varroa mite (Varroa destructor). This parasitic mite undermines honey bee health by literally draining the life from honey bees, spreading viral diseases, and wiping out vast numbers of hives along with the pollination services these bees provide. As a result, these tiny mites are one of the biggest threats to honey bees and global food production.
“Varroa mites are one of the most serious threats to honey bee health and hives across North America,” said Bob Sears, President of the Eastern Missouri Beekeepers Association. “This straightforward guide, compiled using the best available scientific and commercial information, will equip beekeepers — from hobbyists to commercial — with effective and environmentally sensitive approaches to monitoring as well as control techniques to ensure their colonies can endure.”
“These problematic parasites have demonstrated a startling resiliency and ability to spread to other honey bee colonies,” said Christi Heintz, Executive Director of Project Apis m. “This guide, developed by leading honey bee health experts, will ensure beekeepers can more easily confront the problem of Varroa mite infestations, better protect their own bees, and mitigate the parasites’ abilities to move into other nearby apiaries.”
The Honey Bee Health Coalition worked with Dr. Dewey Caron, emeritus professor of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology at the University of Delaware and affiliate professor at Oregon State University’s Department of Horticulture, to gather input from leading experts on Varroa mite control. The resulting guide identifies straightforward, proactive, and flexible monitoring methods and guidelines to help beekeepers detect and control Varroa mites.
The guide, which can be found at http://honeybeehealthcoalition.org/Varroa, lays out an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategy for managing Varroa mite infestations; including how to monitor mite levels, chemical and non-chemical methods to control the mites, and methods to determine which treatment is appropriate for a beekeeper to use at different phases in a colony’s life cycle.
About the Honey Bee Health Coalition
The Honey Bee Health Coalition brings together beekeepers, growers, researchers, government agencies, agribusinesses, conservation groups, manufacturers and brands, and other key partners to improve the health of honey bees and other pollinators. Its mission is to collaboratively implement solutions that will help to achieve a healthy population of honey bees while also supporting healthy populations of native and managed pollinators in the context of productive agricultural systems and thriving ecosystems. The Coalition is focusing on accelerating collective impact to improve honey bee health in four key areas: forage and nutrition, hive management, crop pest management, and communications, outreach and education.
Through its unique network of private and public sector members, the Coalition fosters new partnerships, leverages existing efforts and expertise, and incubates and implements new solutions. The Coalition brings together diverse resources to promote communication, coordination, collaboration, and investment to strategically and substantively improve honey bee health in North America.
More information, including a list of Honey Bee Health Coalition members, can be found at: http://honeybeehealthcoalition.org.
What Is Killing America's Bees and What Does It Mean for Us?
Pollinators are vanishing, and a silent spring could become a horrifying reality. So why won't the EPA do more?
By Alex Morris August 18, 2015
There was a moment last year when beekeeper Jim Doan was ready to concede defeat. He stood in the kitchen of his rural New York home, holding the phone to his ear. Through the window, he could see the frigid January evening settling on the 112-acre farm he'd just been forced to sell two weeks earlier. On the other end of the line, his wife's voice was matter-of-fact: "Jimmy, I just want to say I'm sorry, but the bees are dead."
By then, Doan was used to taking in bad news. After all, this was long after the summer of 2006, when he had first started noticing that his bees were acting oddly: not laying eggs or going queenless or inexplicably trying to make multiple queens. It was long after the day when he'd gone out to check his bee yard and discovered that of the 5,600 hives he kept at the time, all but 600 were empty. And it was long after he'd learned back in 2007 that he was not alone, that beekeepers all around the country, and even the world, were finding that their bees had not just died but had actually vanished, a phenomenon that was eventually named colony collapse disorder and heralded as proof of the fast-approaching End of Days by evangelicals and environmentalists alike. Theories abounded about what was causing CCD. Were bees, the most hardworking and selfless of creatures, being called up to heaven before the rest of us? Were they victims of a Russian plot? Of cellphone interference? Of UV light? Were they the "canary in the coal mine," as the Obama administration suggested, signaling the degradation of the natural world at the hands of man? Possibly. Probably. No one knew.
Even to Doan, at the epicenter of the crisis, none of it had made a lick of sense. As a third-generation beekeeper, he and his family had been running bees since the 1950s, and it had been good money; in the 1980s, a thousand hives could earn a beekeeper between $65,000 and $70,000 a year in honey sales alone, not to mention the cash coming in from leasing hives out to farmers to help pollinate their fields. But more than that, it was a way of life that suited Doan. He'd gotten his first hive in 1968, at the age of five, with $15 he'd borrowed from his parents. He paid his way through college with the 150 hives he owned by then, coming home to tend them on the weekends. He was fascinated by the industrious insects. "It's just that they are such interesting creatures to watch on a daily basis," he says. "If you spend any time with bees, you develop a passion for them."
In fact, humans have felt this way about honeybees for millennia. In ancient times, they were thought to be prophetic. Honey gathering is depicted in cave paintings that date back to the Paleolithic Age. The ancient Egyptians floated bees on rafts down the Nile to get them from one crop to another. While honeybees are not native to North America, they were deemed important enough to be packed up by the Pilgrims, and crossed the Atlantic around 1622 (according to Thomas Jefferson, the Native Americans referred to them as "white man's flies"). Today, bees are responsible for one out of every three bites of food you eat and are an agricultural commodity that's been valued at $15 billion annually in the U.S. alone. They are a major workforce with a dogged work ethic — bees from one hive can collect pollen from up to 100,000 flowering plants in a single day, pollinating many of them in the process. Americans
wouldn't necessarily starve without them, but our diets would be a lot more bland and a lot less nutritious.
By the time Doan got that call from his wife in January 2014, his hives had dwindled from 5,600 in 2006 to 2,300 in 2008 to a mere 275, most of which he now feared were dead. Even the hives that did survive had to be coaxed and coddled. Rather than finding their own food, they needed to be fed. Instead of averaging 124 pounds of honey per hive, they averaged nine.
At first, Doan blamed himself. "Before 2006, basically you couldn't do anything wrong," he says. "Very seldom did you lose bees unless you were a really bad beekeeper. If you lost one hive a yard,that was a lot." He racked his brain, trying to figure out what mistakes he might be making. He worried that he was letting his father and grandfather down,that he was letting his son down — even though he knew that other beekeepers were struggling too. Every time a major die-off happened, he tried to regroup, taking the remaining healthy hives, dividing them in two and buying new queens to stock them, but the constant splitting meant that the new colonies were weaker and less established than the ones before. Doan grew more and more depressed. "I was just mentally exhausted," he tells me. "I mean, you have to have bees to be a beekeeper. At that point, I truly thought, 'What's the point of living?' "
Doan never really considered the possibility that the fault might not be his own until scientists at Penn State who had been testing his bees told him of news coming out of France that pointed the finger at a relatively new class of insecticides called neonicotinoids, or neonics. The first commercially successful neonicotinoid compound was synthesized by agrochemical giant Bayer CropScience in 1985, but it wasn't until the early 2000s that they began to be used extensively. Compared to older, more toxic insecticides, neonics certainly seemed to be a win-win: Though neurotoxins, they mess with insect brains far more than those of mammals, and their application is a breeze. All a farmer need do is sow a seed coated in neonics and the water-soluble chemicals get drawn back up into the plant as it grows. Referred to as systemic insecticides, they spread through the plant, making it resistant to predators. Neonics don't require repeated applications in a hazmat suit. Rain can't wash them away — but then again, neither can your kitchen faucet (unless you're eating strictly organic, you're eating neonicotinoids all the time).
Doan knew his hives had tested positive for the neonicotinoid clothianidin, but the results had seemed dubious because clothianidin wasn't even registered for use in New York state. That's when he learned that neonic-coated seeds weren't subject to the same regulations as sprayed pesticides, meaning that seeds couldn't be treated in New York, but they could be purchased elsewhere and then planted there, with no one the wiser. Furthermore, studies demonstrated that bees exposed to sublethal amounts of these neonicotinoids showed a loss in cognitive functions, including their ability to navigate home.
To Doan, this seemed like a breakthrough — a perfect explanation for why his bees hadn't just been dying, but disappearing altogether. He testified at the Environmental Protection Agency. He testified in front of Congress. He was interviewed for a Time magazine article on neonics in 2013, the very same year a report by the European Food Safety Authority showed "high acute risks" to bees from neonics and the European Union issued a ban on the three that are most widely used. Meanwhile, the Saving America's Pollinators Act, a congressional bill introduced in 2013 by Reps. John Conyers and Earl Blumenauer that would have taken neonics off the market until their safety was more definitively proven, never made it out of committee. (The bill was reintroduced this spring, but its fate remains uncertain.)
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/what-is-killing-americas-bees-and-what-does-it-mean-for-us-20150818#ixzz3jkcyuY7a
Minneapolis takes action to protect dwindling local bee population
Today the Minneapolis City Council and Mayor Betsy Hodges took significant action in the fight to protect the sharply declining local bee population. The City Council passed a resolution that the mayor signed which commits Minneapolis to increasing bee-friendly plants in the city and decreasing pesticide use.
The resolution also declares Minneapolis a pollinator-friendly community and encourages residents and businesses to adopt pollinator-friendly practices such as planting habitat for bees and avoiding pesticides that are known to kill them.
Pollinator populations are in sharp decline because of an ongoing loss of habitat coupled with a simultaneous large-scale expansion of pesticide use by homeowners, landscapers, property managers and farmers.
Pollinators are a necessary component of a healthy ecosystem and food system, providing pollination of plants needed to grow vegetables, herbs and fruits. Local food production is needed to improve the health and food security of Minneapolis residents, and insect pollination is an essential component of local food production.
The City commits to making the following improvements to City policies and practices to increase pollinator forage and decrease pesticide use:
· The Public Works Department will pursue planting more pollinator forage in appropriate locations (including stormwater management ponds and large land areas) that are currently turf grass, adopt clear guidelines against the use of pesticides and pesticide-treated plants, and consider pollinator-friendly amendments to its land management policy.
· The Community Planning and Economic Development Department will pilot planting pollinator forage on vacant land it controls and encourage private developers to incorporate pollinator-friendly plantings into required landscaping.
· The Property Services Division of the City Coordinator’s Office will pursue planting more pollinator forage on City facilities. A pilot is already underway at four Minneapolis Fire Department facilities.
· The Health Department’s Environmental Services Unit will maintain resources for other City departments including a list of pollinator-friendly plants.
· The Minneapolis Convention Center will incorporate more pollinator forage into its plantings and phase out the use of “systemic” insecticides (which stay in the plant).
The City of Minneapolis urges all Minneapolis property owners, residents, businesses, institutions and neighborhoods to become more pollinator friendly by adopting practices including:
· Committing to not use pesticides, including insecticides that stay in the plant, on their properties.
· Avoiding planting flowering plants that are treated with insecticides that stay in the plant.
· Discontinuing the sale of pesticides and plants that are treated with insecticides that stay in the plant.
· Planting more pollinator forage on their property and using organic or chemical-free lawn and landscaping practices.
The State of Minnesota prevents local governments from regulating any matters concerning pesticides. The City of Minneapolis will continue to advocate at the State and federal level for increased authority to address the non-agricultural use of pesticides, and for other pollinator-friendly policies.
Published Aug 21, 2015
USDA Encourages Producers to Consider Risk Protection Coverage before Fall Crop Sales Deadlines
Disaster Assistance is Available for Crops that are Ineligible for Federal Insurance
WASHINGTON, Aug. 20, 2015 – Farm Service Agency Administrator Val Dolcini today encouraged producers to examine the available U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) crop risk protection options, including federal crop insurance and Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) coverage, before the sales deadline for fall crops.
“Deadlines are quickly approaching to purchase coverage for fall-seeded crops,” said Dolcini. "We remind producers that crops not covered by insurance may be eligible for the Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program. The 2014 Farm Bill expanded NAP to include higher levels of protection. Beginning, underserved and limited resource farmers are now eligible for free catastrophic level coverage, as well as discounted premiums for additional levels of protection."
Federal crop insurance covers crop losses from natural adversities such as drought, hail and excessive moisture. NAP covers losses from natural disasters on crops for which no permanent federal crop insurance program is available, including forage and grazing crops, fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, floriculture, ornamental nursery, aquaculture, turf grass, ginseng, honey, syrup, bioenergy, and industrial crops.
USDA has partnered with Michigan State University and the University of Illinois to create an online tool at www.fsa.usda.gov/napthat allows producers to determine whether their crops are eligible for federal crop insurance or NAP and to explore the best level of protection for their operation. NAP basic coverage is available at 55 percent of the average market price for crop losses that exceed 50 percent of expected production, with higher levels of coverage, up to 65 percent of their expected production at 100 percent of the average market price, including coverage for organics and crops marketed directly to consumers.
Deadlines for coverage vary by state and crop. To learn more about NAP visit www.fsa.usda.gov/napor contact your local USDA Service Center. To find your local USDA Service Centers go to http://offices.usda.gov/.
Federal crop insurance coverage is sold and delivered solely through private insurance agents. Agent lists are available at all USDA Service Centers or at USDA’s online Agent Locator: http://prodwebnlb.rma.usda.gov/apps/AgentLocator/#. Producers can use the USDA Cost Estimator, https://ewebapp.rma.usda.gov/apps/costestimator/Default.aspx, to predict insurance premium costs.
NAP was reauthorized by the 2014 Farm Bill. The Farm Bill builds on historic economic gains in rural America over the past six years, while achieving meaningful reform and billions of dollars in savings for taxpayers. Since enactment, USDA has made significant progress to implement each provision of this critical legislation, including providing disaster relief to farmers and ranchers; strengthening risk management tools; expanding access to rural credit; funding critical research; establishing innovative public-private conservation partnerships; developing new markets for rural-made products; and investing in infrastructure, housing and community facilities to help improve quality of life in rural America. For more information, visit www.usda.gov/farmbill.
The Colorado State Beekeepers Association (CSBA) will be "Puttin' the Bee in Boulder" for the first 3 days of October and we would like to invite you to join in the festivities. The "Healthy Bee / Bee Healthy" WAS conference will take place at the Millennium Harvest House hotel and will feature 3 days of top notch speakers, networking and evening activities.
The first 2 days will focus on bee health and the final day will feature mainstream medical doctors and veterinarians speaking on bees and human health. Mark Winston, noted author and bee researcher will be the keynote luncheon speaker on Friday and Marla Spivak, MacArthur Fellow from the University of Minnesota, will be the luncheon keynote on Saturday. There are workshops on gardening for pollinators, apitherapy and other uses for bee products. On Saturday evening, there will be a Farm-to-Table dinner featuring renowned gardener Lauren Springer Ogden. For a complete schedule, click here .
Interest in bees and other pollinators is at an all-time high! We are expecting several hundred attendees from all over the western US, including Alaska and Hawaii as well as the western provinces of Canada. On Saturday, we are expecting significantly more from the Boulder community. The conference is being marketed through a variety of channels including mail, email and social media outlets. Sponsor and vendor opportunities abound! There are several FREE tables reserved for non-profit messaging. Remember, the CSBA is a 501c3 organization and your donations may be tax deductible.
EARLY BEE DISCOUNTS AVAILABLE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1!
The conference program deadlines have been announced, too! Everyone at the conference receives a copy of the program. Deadline for bookings and copy is September 10th.
Rates (full color) are -
Full page $150 Half page (horizontal) $85
Quarter page (vertical) $50 Business card (horizontal) $25
Please contact the President of Colorado State Beekeepers Assn. if you have any further questions regarding the conference sponsor and vendor information, Beth Conrey email@example.com. The CSBA will be "Puttin' the Bee in Boulder" October 1-3, 2015. You want to bee there so save the dates!
Bee Informed Partership
The Bee Informed Partnership invites you to check out our latest program for backyard beekeepers, BIP’s HiveCheck Program. Every two weeks we’re sending hundreds of beekeepers across the country a short 10 question survey asking how they are managing their colonies to share management practices with each other. At the end of each week we send a detailed report of all the responses to our participants including filters to see management trends by region and even by state for premium members! Join Us Today By Signing Up For A Free National Report Membership! If you like you can also sign up for our premium membership to Support Bee Informed’s research and receive more detailed reports. We hope to see you sharing your management practices with us and the nation!
– The Bee Informed Team
Proposals sought for honeybee research
BISMARCK – Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring has announced that up to $75,000 is available to fund research of honeybees.
“The North Dakota Department of Agriculture is seeking grant proposals for research into finding practical solutions to honeybee health issues,” he said. “The State Legislature made this money available to counter the increasing seriousness of bee diseases and parasites.”
Goehring said applicants can submit proposals for any or all of five research priorities:
· Colony collapse cause, management
· Varroa mite control
· Understanding honeybee viruses and effects on honeybee health
· Correlating pathogen presence to management practices
· Other problem-solving ideas of interest to the beekeeping industry
Funded research projects must be completed by June 30, 2017. Multiple grants may be awarded. Proposals funding partial projects and proposals providing valuable extensions of previously funded projects will be considered.
Complete information on applying for research funds is available on the NDDA website at www.nd.gov/ndda. Grants applications must be received by September 15, 2015.
Additional information is available by contacting Samantha Brunner at (701)328-4765 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Some honeybee colonies adapt in wake of deadly mites
By Krishna Ramanujan
A new genetics study of wild honeybees offers clues to how a population has adapted to a mite that has devastated bee colonies worldwide. The findings may aid beekeepers and bee breeders to prevent future honeybee declines.
The researchers genetically analyzed museum samples collected from wild honeybee colonies in 1977 and 2010; the bees came from Cornell University’s Arnot Forest. In comparing genomes from the two time periods, the results – published Aug. 6 in Nature Communications – show clear evidence that the wild honeybee colonies experienced a genetic bottleneck - a loss of genetic diversity - when the Varroa destructor mites killed most of the honeybee colonies. But some colonies survived, allowing the population to rebound.
“The study is a unique and powerful contribution to understanding how honeybees have been impacted by the introduction of Varroa destructor, and how, if left alone, they can evolve resistance to this deadly parasite,” said Thomas Seeley, the Horace White Professor in Biology at Cornell and the paper’s senior author. Sasha Mikheyev ’00, an assistant professor of ecology and evolution at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) in Japan, is the paper’s first author.
“The paper is also a clear demonstration of the importance of museum collections, in this case the Cornell University Insect Collection, and the importance of wild places, such as Cornell’s Arnot Forest,” Seeley added.
In the 1970s, Seeley surveyed the population of wild colonies of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in Arnot Forest, and found 2.5 colonies per square mile. By the early 1990s, V. destructor mites had spread across the U.S. to New York state and were devastating bee colonies. The mites infest nursery cells in honeybee nests and feed on developing bees while also transferring virulent viruses.
A 2002 survey of Arnot Forest by Seeley revealed the same abundance of bee colonies as in the late 1970s, suggesting that either new colonies from beekeepers' hives had repopulated the area, or that the existing population had undergone strong natural selection and came out with good resistance.
By 2010, advances in DNA technology, used previously to stitch together fragmented DNA from Neanderthal samples, gave Mikheyev, Seeley and colleagues the tools for whole-genome sequencing and comparing museum and modern specimens.
The results revealed a huge loss in diversity of mitochondrial genes, which are passed from one generation to the next only through the female lineage. This shows that the wild population of honeybees experienced a genetic bottleneck. Such bottlenecks arise when few individuals reproduce, reducing the gene pool. “Maybe only four or five queens survived and repopulated the forest,” Seeley said.
At the same time, the surviving bees show high genetic diversity in their nuclear genes, passed on by dying colonies that still managed to produce male bees. The nuclear DNA showed widespread genetic changes, a signature of adaptation. “Even when a colony is not doing well, it can still produce a batch of males, so nuclear genes were not lost,” Seeley said.
The data also show a lack of genes coming from outside populations, such as beekeepers' bees.
The surviving bees evolved to be smaller, suggesting these bees might require less time to develop. Since the mites infest nursery cells in hives, the shorter development time may allow young bees to develop into adulthood before the mites can finish their development. Mite-resistant honeybees in Africa are also small and have short development times, Seeley said.
Next, the researchers will study which genes and traits confer resistance to Varroa mites. The findings may help beekeepers to avoid pesticides for controlling mites and to trust the process of natural selection, and bee breeders to develop bees with the traits that have enabled bees to survive in the wild.
The study was funded by the OIST and the North American Pollinator Protection Campaign.
Flowers can endanger bees, study finds
By Iqbal Pittalwala, University of California, Davis August 07, 2015
Despite their beauty, flowers can pose a grave danger to bees by providing a platform of parasites to visiting bees, a team of researchers has determined.
“Flowers are hotspots for parasite spread between and within pollinator populations,” said Peter Graystock, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Entomology at the University of California, Riverside and a member of the research team. “Both the flower and bee species play a role in how likely parasite dispersal will occur.”
The study, published online in theProceedings of the Royal Society B, is the first to show that not only can bees disperse parasites around the environment but also that flowers are platforms for a host of pollinator parasites subsequently dispersed onto visiting bees.
“By showing that visits from parasite-carrying bees can turn flowers into parasite platforms, we can say that it is likely that heavily visited flowers may become more ‘dirty’ with bee parasites,” said Graystock, the research paper’s first author. “Planting more flowers would provide bees with more options, and parasite spread may thus be reduced.”
The researchers found four common honey bee and bumblebee parasites dispersed via flowers: Nosema apis(causes a honey bee disease),Nosema ceranae (causes an emergent disease in honey bees and bumblebees), Crithidia bombi (causes a bumblebee disease) and Apicystis bombi (mostly found in bumblebees). These parasites are known to cause, lethargy, dysentery, colony collapse, and queen death in heavily infected bees.
Currently, bees are frequently transported across state and international territories. Quarantine and parasite screening usually cover only the screening of host-specific diseases. But bumblebees can transport honey bee parasites, and vice versa, the research team has now shown, and proposes that increased screening protocols be employed to protect pollinator diversity.
“With some 20,000 bee species, it is a surprise that only recently has research in pollinator health considered the interactions between bee species,” Graystock said. “Our finding may also affect the national and international trade of flowers unless sterilization of parasites on these flowers can be guaranteed. Otherwise flower movements may also be moving pollinator parasites to new territories.”
He explained that commercially imported bumblebees have been found to contain a cocktail of parasites that are harmful to both bumblebees and honeybees.
“We know these commercially imported bumblebees, when given the opportunity, will forage on the same flowers as wild bees and honeybees,” he said.
In their experiments, Graystock and his colleagues allowed one species of bee (honey bees or bumblebees) from hives containing parasites to forage on flowers for three hours. The bees were then removed and a second group of flowers were added to the foraging arena along with colonies of a second bee species (a species not used before). The new bees then foraged upon both the new and previously foraged flowers for three hours. All flowers were then sampled to see if parasites had dispersed onto them. Parasites found in the original patch confirmed parasite dispersal by the original hosts. Parasites found in the new group of flowers confirmed the non-target bee was able to disperse the parasites.
Next, Graystock, who works in the lab of Quinn McFrederick, an assistant professor of entomology, is looking at how flowers may also be hubs for transmitting not just parasites but also potentially beneficial microbes. He is looking, too, at the role different flowers play on bee survival and development.
The current research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council in the United Kingdom and the Bumblebee Conservation Trust.
Graystock was joined in the study by Dave Goulson and William O. H. Hughes at the University of Sussex, the United Kingdom.
AHPA would like to help sponsor the Apimondia USA Bid 2019
What is Apimondia?
Apimondia is the bi-annual congress of the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Associations. The federation was founded in 1949 and has a mission of promoting the scientific, technical, ecological, social and economic apiculture development in all countries.
One of Apimondia’s main objectives is to provide a meeting for exchanging information and engaging in discussions between beekeepers, scientists, honey producers, government agencies, technicians and those working for apiculture development. To learn more about Apimondia, click here.
The United States has the unparalleled opportunity to bring the worldwide beekeeping community to our back yard. Winning the bid for the Apimondia Worldwide Beekeeping Congress in 2019 is the perfect way to showcase our industry as never before. Representatives from our chosen host city, Minneapolis, MN, will join the United States delegation in Daejeon, South Korea, to support the effort to acquaint the world with the many advantages of the United States hosting Apimondia 2019.
The Apimondia Congress attendance is typically between 4,000 to 6,000 people. However, in 2013 when the congress met in Kiev, Ukraine, attendance topped 8,000. We believe that in the United States, we can reach this same attendance goal.
But we need your support.
Sponsorships for the USA Apimondia 2019 bid will be used for:
Set up and maintaining of Apimondia USA Bid for 2019 website.
Producing USA Apimondia 2019 film.
Hosting international Apimondia officials for site inspection of host city.
ApiExpo Booth and set up in Daejeon, South Korea.
Official bid book presented to all voting Apimondia delegates.
Special event for voting delegates in Daejeon, South Korea.
Promotion of USA Apimondia 2019 in the USA at local, state and national levels.
The USA hosted the Apimondia Worldwide Beekeeping Congress XXI in Maryland in 1967. Our goal of bringing the worldwide beekeeping community back to the USA for Apimondia XLVI in 2019 can only become a reality with your help.
If you would like to donate on behalf of the AHPA
Donations Deadline is August 31, 2015
DEADLINE is approaching! Get your application in by the end of July. The Awards Office will contact you with an email telling you when and where to send your product samples for tasting. Judging for all product areas is Sunday, September 13th. Awards will be given out in Liquid & Naturally Crystallized, Creamed, Comb and Infused Honey subcategories. Amina Harris, Director of the Honey and Pollination Center, is chair of this year’s awards.
Click here to see the full criteria, the list of judges and committee members, and to enter your honey in the 2016 Good Food Awards.
Pesticides found in most pollen collected from foraging bees in Massachusetts
Boston, MA ─ More than 70% of pollen and honey samples collected from foraging bees in Massachusetts contain at least one neonicotinoid, a class of pesticide that has been implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), in which adult bees abandon their hives during winter, according to a new study from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
The study will be published online July 23, 2015 in the Journal of Environmental Chemistry.
“Data from this study clearly demonstrated the ubiquity of neonicotinoids in pollen and honey samples that bees are exposed to during the seasons when they are actively foraging across Massachusetts. Levels of neonicotinoids that we found in this study fall into ranges that could lead to detrimental health effects in bees, including CCD,” said Chensheng (Alex) Lu, associate professor of environmental exposure biology in the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard Chan School and lead author of the study.
Since 2006, there have been significant losses of honey bee colonies. Scientists, policymakers, farmers, and beekeepers are concerned with this problem because bees are prime pollinators of roughly one-third of all crops worldwide.
Previous studies analyzed either stored pollen collected from hives or pollen samples collected from bees at a single point in time. In this study, the Harvard Chan School researchers looked at pollen samples collected over time—during spring and summer months when bees forage—from the same set of hives across Massachusetts. Collecting pollen samples in this way enabled the researchers to determine variations in the levels of eight neonicotinoids and to identify high-risk locations or months for neonicotinoid exposure for bees. To do so, the researchers worked with 62 Massachusetts beekeepers who volunteered to collect monthly samples of pollen and honey from foraging bees, from April through August 2013, using pollen traps on the landings of beehives. The beekeepers then sent the samples to the researchers.
The researchers analyzed 219 pollen and 53 honey samples from 62 hives, from 10 out of 14 counties in Massachusetts. They found neonicotinoids in pollen and honey for each month collected, in each location—suggesting that bees are at risk of neonicotinoid exposure any time they are foraging anywhere in Massachusetts.
The most commonly detected neonicotinoid was imidacloprid, followed by dinotefuran. Particularly high concentrations of neonicotinoids were found in Worcester County in April, in Hampshire County in May, in Suffolk County in July, and in Essex County in June, suggesting that, in these counties, certain months pose significant risks to bees.
The new findings suggest that neonicotinoids are being used throughout Massachusetts. Not only do these pesticides pose a significant risk for the survival of honey bees, but they also may pose health risks for people inhaling neonicotinoid-contaminated pollen, Lu said. “The data presented in this study should serve as a basis for public policy that aims to reduce neonicotinoid exposure,” he said.
Other Harvard Chan School authors of the study included doctoral student Chi-Hsuan Chang, research fellow Lin Tao, and research associate Mei Chen.
Funding for this study came from the Woodshouse Foundation and the Harvard-NIEHS Center for Environmental Health (P30ES000002).
“Distributions of neonicotinoid insecticides in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: a temporal and spatial variation analysis for pollen and honey samples,” Chensheng (Alex) Lu, Chi-Hsuan Chang, Lin Tao and Mei Chen, Journal of Environmental Chemistry, online July 23, 2015, doi: 10.1071/EN15064
Visit the Harvard Chan website for the latest news, press releases, and multimedia offerings.
In Brief: Gluing bees with tiny transmitters
Published Jul 24, 2015, 5:00 am SGT
Gluing bees with tiny transmitters
Researchers have been able to attach miniature transmitters to the backs of bees to better understand how disease affects the threatened insects.
Lead researcher Lori Lach from James Cook University said the team glued Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) chips to the backs of 960 bees.
Half of the insects were infected with a low dose of nosema spores, a gut parasite common among adult honey bees, while the rest of the bees remained disease-free, said the university in a statement.
Using the RFID tags in combination with observations at the hives and artificial flowers, the researchers were able to see how hard the bees worked and what kind of material they gathered.
The fungus nosema (Nosema apis) used in the study has long been thought to be benign, compared with the many other parasites and pathogens that infect honey bees.
"We knew diseased bees couldn't forage or pollinate," said Dr Lach. "But what we wanted to investigate was the behaviour of live bees that are affected by non-lethal stressors."
The researchers said that infected bees were 4.3 times less likely to be carrying pollen than uninfected bees, and carried less pollen when they did.
Infected bees also started working later, stopped working sooner and died at a younger age.
Dr Lach said nosema-infected bees look just like normal bees, so it is important to understand the behavioural changes the parasite may be causing.
"The real implications from this work are for humans. About a quarter of our food production is dependent on honey bee pollination," she said.
"Declines in the ability of honey bees to pollinate will result in lower crop yields."
The Almond Board of California is in the process of conducting an annual review of the Pollination Directory to ensure it is kept current for growers’ use.
In an effort to maintain the accuracy of the Almond Board of California’s Pollination Directory for California Almond growers, we are conducting an annual review of the beekeeper entries. Please review your existing information on the Pollination Directory.
If you don’t have any changes or corrections to make, please reply to email@example.com with your Company Name and let us know your entry is fine as-is.
If you do have revisions to make, please resubmit your information using the beekeeper information form.
If we do not hear back from you or see a new entry submitted by August 1, 2015, your existing entry and contact information will be removed.
We appreciate the services you provide to the California Almond industry and look forward to maintaining an accurate Pollination Directory for everyone.
This update only pertains to those currently listed in the Directory. Any beekeeper and bee broker not currently participating in the Pollination Directory and would like to, may use the beekeeper information form link above.
Anyone can be added to the Pollination Directory or changes made at any time by following this path http://www.almonds.com/resources?from-section=2881&county=all&category%5B2296%5D=2296&category%5B2206%5D=2206&=Search.
The main purpose of this update is to ensure the Directory is current for growers to access as they begin their pollination plans for the coming crop year.
Please call Debye Hunter at 209.343.3230 or e-mail her at the firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any problems accessing the links above or have questions regarding the Pollination Directory.
Harvard Study Proves Why The Bees Are All Disappearing
The human race is really starting to feel the consequences of their actions.
One area we are waking up to is the massive amount of pesticides we spray (especially in North America) on our food that has not only been linked to human disease, but a massive die off in the global bee population within the past few years.
A new study out of Harvard University, published in the June edition of the Bulletin of Insectology puts the nail in the coffin, neonicotinoids are killing bees at an exponential rate, they are the direct cause of the phenomenon labeled as colony collapse disorder (CCD).
Neonicotinoid’s are the world’s most widely used insecticides. (1)
“The results from this study not only replicate findings from the previous study, but also reinforce the conclusion that the sublethal exposure to neonicotinoids is likely the main culprit for the occurrence of CCD.” (1)
For this study, researchers examined 18 bee colonies at three different apiaries in central Massachusetts over the course of a year. Four colonies at each apiary were regularly treated with realistic doses of neonicotinoid pesticides, while a total of six hives were left untreated. Of the 12 hives treated with the pesticides, six were completely wiped out.
Neonicotinoids insecticides, persist in “extremely high levels” in planter exhaust material produced during the planting of crops treated with these insecticides. This runs contrary to industry claims that the chemicals biodegrade and are not a threat.
These pesticide components are found in soil, they are also found in fields where the chemicals are not even sprayed. Bees also actively transfer contaminated pollen from primarily pesticide treated corn crops and bring it back to their hives.
Furthermore, bees transfer these pesticides to other plants and crops that are not treated with the chemicals, which goes to show just how persistent these chemicals truly are in the environment.
There has been an enormous amount of research which shows that our current regulations which protect the creatures that pollinate much of our food is extremely inadequate. It’s been published in a number of peer-reviewed journals showing how widely used pesticides have a very damaging effect on bees.
A paper published in the journal Nature discusses how bees are twice as likely to die when exposed to pesticides; two-thirds of the bees are lost when exposed compared to a third when not exposed. The exposed bees are also half as successful in gathering food. (2)
Scientists from the US Department of Agriculture as well as the University of Maryland published a study that linked chemicals, including fungicides, to the large scale die-off of bees that has recently plagued the planet, you can read that study here.
In the United Stats alone, the honey bee population declined by approximately 30 percent, with some beekeepers reporting losses up to 90 and 100 percent. More than 100 US crops rely on honey bees to pollinate them.
The study determined that fields ranging from Maine to Delaware contained nine different agricultural chemicals. These included fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides. In some cases they even recorded samples of 21 different agricultural chemicals.
Europe also recently recorded the largest bee loss in their history.
Not only have these pesticides been linked to various health ailments, they are killing bees all over the world. It’s not just bees, the disappearance of Monarch Butterflies has also been linked to Monsanto’s roundup herbicide. It’s time we completely ban something that has absolutely no reason to exist, we can do better than this.
As we continue to take actions like this we continue to see that how we are currently doing things simply cannot be sustained. This type of issue does not just reflect how we treat nature but also reflects how we operate as a whole. If money wasn’t so important, we wouldn’t be finding unnatural ways to do everything on this planet.
If we weren’t so concerned with maintaining an economy, issues such as these wouldn’t affect us. This is all a perfect lesson for us to ask “what the heck are we doing to our planet?” We are at a point where our very survival is now threatened because we are fighting so hard to maintain a system we all don’t like anyway.
“If the bee disappeared off the face of the earth, man would only have four years left to live.” – Albert Einstein
For more information on how pesticides are harming human health, click HERE
Pollinator News July 10, 2015
New Rule by EPA Proposed to Protect Honey Bees
EPA released a New Rule for public comment, Bees; Mitigating Exposure from Acutely Toxic Pesticide Products (Docket #: EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0818-0003; deadline for comments July 29, 2015). The Pollinator Stewardship Council will be submitting our comment to the public docket, and we will be seeking your comments as well in a separate email to you. The New Rule has two parts: Part A. Label Language for Applications to Sites With Bees Present Under Contracted Services, and Part B. State and Tribal Managed Pollinator Protection Plans. (read the text of the Proposed New Rule here)
In summary, honey bees need to be afforded the same protections, whether under contract, or not under contract for pollination services. No matter where the bees are they must be protected from all forms of exposure of acutely toxic pesticides. This proposed New Rule offers no protection from the synergistic effects of tank mixes upon honey bees while under contract, nor does it protect bees under contract from systemic pesticides. The bee kill incidents of the past few years were due to tank mixes including fungicides, yet the pesticide label offers no protection to pollinators from tank mixes of products with fungicides and insect growth regulators. The seventy-six acute toxicity compounds affecting more than 1,000 products are known and labelled as such. It is the tank mixed pesticides with synergized and unknown toxicities that this proposed new rule does not address, and needs to address.
Retaining a pesticide label with exceptions to apply acutely toxic pesticides to honey bees not under contract pollination is unacceptable. Clear pesticide label protection guidelines are integral to protecting pollinators. Without pesticide label language, with defined terminology, pollinators will simply be “removed by mortality.”
Beekeepers should not suffer the loss of their livestock simply because they are not under a crop pollination contract. A soybean farmer would not appreciate a farming practice in corn that killed his soybean crop, or wiped out half of his field. Part “A” of this proposed new rule changes nothing for the beekeepers, and their honey bees concerning exposure to bee toxic pesticides. Part “B” of this proposed rule simply provides federal acknowledgement of the request of States to develop their own Pollinator Protection Plans. However, it provides no funding for apiary inspectors and lab testing of honey bees related to alleged pesticide bee kills, and it permits States to remove honey bees and native pollinators from the ecosystem; by forcing their removal or through the pollinators’ mortality.
EPA’s mission is to protect human health and the environment. This New Rule does not provide protection of honey bees and native pollinators from acutely toxic pesticide products under contracted pollination or not. State Pollinator Protection Plans tasked with effectively reducing the likelihood of bees being present in a treatment area is not protection of pollinators, but elimination of pollinators.
Buzz the Alarm: Climate Change Puts Squeeze on Bumblebees
Decline in bumblebee species, and their habitats, caused by global warming, researchers say
By Joshua E. Brown
Global warming is putting the squeeze on bumblebees. In the most comprehensive study ever conducted of the impacts of climate change on critical pollinators, scientists have discovered that global warming is rapidly shrinking the area where these bees are found in both North America and Europe.
Researchers examined more than 420,000 historical and current records of many species of bumblebees — and confirm that bumblebees are in steep decline at a continental scale because of climate change. The new research is reported in the journal Science.
This shrinking range is bad news for more than bees. “Bumblebees pollinate many plants that provide food for humans and wildlife,” says Leif Richardson, a scientist at the University of Vermont who helped lead the new research. “If we don’t stop the decline in the abundance of bumblebees, we may well face higher food prices, diminished varieties, and other troubles.”
“Pollinators are vital for food security and our economy, and widespread losses of pollinators due to climate change will diminish both,” stated Jeremy Kerr, a biologist from the University of Ottawa, who led the new study. “We need to figure out how we can improve the outlook for pollinators at continental scales, but the most important thing we can do is begin to take serious action to reduce the rate of climate change.”
With climate change, many species of animals, including butterflies, have been observed to expand their territory: the northern edge of their range marches toward the North Pole — while the southern edge remains in place. Not so with bumblebees. The team of fourteen scientists who conducted the new study found that northern populations of many bumblebee species are staying put — while the southern range edge is retreating away from the equator.
“This was a surprise,” said Richardson, a bee expert at UVM’s Gund Institute for Ecological Economics. “The bees are losing range on their southern margin and failing to pick up territory at the northern margin — so their habitat range is shrinking.”
Clearly it’s climate
The new study shows that the culprit is not pesticides and it’s not land use changes — two other major threats to bumblebee populations and health. Instead, the research shows clearly that this “range compression,” as the scientists call it, tracks with warming temperatures.
The team also found that bumblebees are shifting to areas of habitat at higher elevation in response to climate change. “Moving upslope doesn't necessarily mean they've lost area there yet,” said UVM’s Richardson, “but, eventually, they may simply run out of hill.”
To conduct their study, the scientists drew on geo-referenced databases from museum collections on both continents. In Vermont, Leif Richardson examined bee specimens at UVM’s Zadock Thompson Zoological Collections.
Over the 110 years of records that the team examined, bumblebees have lost about 185 miles (300 km) from the southern edge of their range in Europe and North America, the scientists estimate. “The scale and pace of these losses are unprecedented,” said Ottawa’s Jeremy Kerr.
There may be an evolutionary explanation for the problems bumblebees now face. Many other species of insects originated and diversified in tropical climates; as temperatures warm, their evolutionary history may allow them to better adapt. Bumblebees, however have “unusual evolutionary origins in the cool Palearctic,” the scientists write, which may help explain their rapid losses of terrain from the south and lagging expansion in the warming north.
To respond to this problem, the research team suggests that a dramatic solution be considered: moving bee populations into new areas where they might persist. This “assisted migration” idea has been considered — and controversial — in conservation biology circles for more than a decade, but is gaining support as warming continues.
“We need new strategies to help these species cope with the effects of human-caused climate change, perhaps assisting them to shift into northern areas,” said Kerr. But the most important message of this study is “the need to halt or reverse climate warming,” said Leif Richardson, a USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture postdoctoral research fellow in UVM’s Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources.
“These findings could spell trouble for many plants — including some crops, like blueberries — that depend on bumblebees for pollination,” said Richardson, a researcher in UVM’s Taylor Ricketts Lab. “Bumblebees are crucial to our natural ecosystems.”
Infographic courtesy of Ann Sanderson, Sheila Colla and Paul Galpern.
The Honey Bee’s Sweet Role in Agriculture
Friday, July 03, 2015/Categories: General News, Today's Top 5, Research
Honey bees produce more then just honey, they actually account for 80% of all insect pollination which helps our fruit, vegetable and other crops grow. But the U.S. beekeeping industry has faced some serious challenges here of late; mainly a mystery disease called Colony Collapse Disorder which has killed millions of bees.
The Northern Ag Network’s Russell Nemetz recently ventured out to learn more about the bee keeping industry and the honey bee’s important role in food production
President & CEO
Blue Diamond Almond Growers
“Facts are Stubborn Things” John Adams
The headlines have been unavoidable. Almonds have been painted as our state’s “thirstiest” crop but what these stories lack is context. The management team from the Blue Diamond Growers cooperative has been collaborating with industry experts to communicate the facts about agricultural water use to the media and our urban neighbors.
According to a recent editorial in San Jose Mercury News, “California's dams and reservoirs were never envisioned to release water year-round for environmental objectives such as aiding the delta smelt or reintroducing salmon in the San Joaquin River watershed. A majority of reservoir water once intended for households or farming is simply sent out to sea.”
The drought debate continues as we enter the hot, dry summer of the Central Valley, with mandatory water restrictions are now in place throughout our state. For many Californians that means the drought will now affect their day-to-day lives. Millions of urban Californians will have to join agriculture in the fight to save water and push for storage to protect our future. Governor Brown’s mandate made it clear that all Californians need to do their part to conserve our most precious resource, and yet the media firestorm aimed at agriculture, and almonds specifically, has been fierce.
Our message has been simple: all food takes water to grow.
California’s agricultural abilities are second to none. In fact, according to the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), nearly half of our country’s fresh fruits, nuts and vegetables come from California. And CDFA reports that from 1967 to 2010, California agriculture has increased revenue and decreased total applied water use by 20 percent! In order to achieve such an impressive statistic, access to a consistent water supply is key. The amount of water required for California farming to grow our food is only 41 percent of captured water with environmental projects taking the majority at 50 percent. The often-quoted 80 percent ignores any water used for environmental purposes.
I have read suggestions that agriculture has been let off the hook by the governor’s mandate. Here are the facts: in 2014 farmers received only 5 percent of their contracted State Water Project allocation and 0 percent from the Federal Central Valley Project. This year, farmers are projected to receive 20 percent of State Water Project allocation and again, 0 percent of Federal Central Valley Project water. Our farmers have been feeling the effects of this drought from the very beginning.
Some have questioned whether agriculture’s economic impact justifies the amount of water used by the industry. The media points to agriculture’s 2.8 percent GDP, but again, this figure lacks context. It does not tell the whole story. Getting our food from farm to fork involves an interconnected supply chain, undoubtedly contributing significantly more than 2.8 percent to the state’s economy. The almond industry alone contributes 104,000 jobs to California, 97,000 of which reside in the Central Valley, and over 37,000 additional jobs throughout the supply chain.
Speaking of almonds, there are 9 million acres of farmland in California and almonds account for 12 percent of that total while only using 8 percent of the water currently used for agriculture. Almond crops produce more than just the kernels humans eat, which provide an efficient source of a heart-healthy, plant-based protein. The almond crop also produces hulls and shells that provide feed and bedding for livestock animals. Almonds rank No. 1 in California for food exports out of the state, with North America consuming four times as many almonds than any other country. Our industry is a global driver of $11 billion in economic activity for California!
In the last 20 years, California almond growers have reduced the amount of water required to grow a pound of almonds by 33 percent. Nearly 70 percent of almond growers use micro-irrigation systems and more than 80 percent use demand-based irrigation scheduling. No one in the world can produce a high-quality almond as efficiently as we can in California!
In times of crisis, there are people who look for someone to blame. Almonds were the first target. Through sharing a few facts about our water stewardship, the media tide has turned to more balanced reporting. As the weather continues to warm into the summer, I expect agriculture will continue to field questions from our urban neighbors about water. Rest assured that Blue Diamond is committed to collaborating with our industry peers, water and environmental experts, consumer groups, regulatory bodies, and policy makers to establish a water policy that makes sense for all Californians – rural and urban, Central Valley and coastal, producers and consumers.
20 million bees spill on Idaho highway, driver runs for his life
By Nate Sunderland, CNN
HOWE, Idaho — An estimated 20 million bees are or will soon be dead following a semitruck crash on State Highway 33 near Howe Thursday morning.
The Butte County Sheriff's Office reports a 2005 Freightliner swerved off the road at milepost 8 south of Howe at 8:01 a.m. The semitruck was carrying 408 beehives, each carrying 50,000 bees.
The bees, owned by KatieBee Honey in Meridian, were being transported to North Dakota to make honey.
"They went off the east side of the northbound lane," Sheriff Wes Collins said. "The truck and trailer tipped over on its passenger side and then righted itself and continued for approximately 75 yards before it came to rest out in the Sagebrush."
It is still unclear why the driver of the truck swerved, officials said.
The beehives were completely destroyed when the flatbed trailer tipped, releasing millions of bees alongside the highway.
The driver of the truck, Rolondo Aparicio of Florida, was uninjured, and took off running down the highway after the accident occurred, Collins said.
KatieBee Honey owner Brian Wiggins said it is a complete loss.
"There is really no saving them when it is this bad," Wiggins said. "All the bees that escaped will be dead by tomorrow, because they can't live without their colonies."
The remaining bees at the crash site were killed with foam by Idaho National Laboratory emergency responders.
The accident occurred near INL.
"If the bees weren't killed they'd continue to be a hazard, especially for motorcyclists," Collins said.
Copyright 2015 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Norway's capital city is building a highway for bees
By Rich McCormick June 26, 2015 02:50 am
Flowers are appearing across buildings, businesses, and balconies in the Norwegian capital of Oslo, as part of a scheme designed to make life easier for the beleaguered honey bee. Oslo is in the process of developing a "bee highway" for the pollinating insects, offering them a safe route through the city complete with food sources, resting spots, and places to live.
The program is led by Bybi, an environmental group supporting urban bee populations, and has secured funding from local companies. Some of these firms have provided dedicated homes for new bee populations, kitting out rooftops and terraces with hives alongside pollen-producing plants. Bee populations, hives, and movements can be tracked on a dedicated site run by the groups behind the scheme — if your Norwegian is up to scratch.
The program is similar to the "butterfly highway" announced by the White House earlier this year. The large-scale American scheme will create and maintain a 1,500-mile corridor of vegetation between Mexico and Minnesota that aims to replenish dwindling Monarch butterfly populations. Both bees and butterflies have vital roles as plant pollinators — 30 to 40 percent of food production requires pollination — but both creatures have suffered huge hits in recent years.
Honey bees started dying off en masse in 2006, a process that has continued in recent years, with 31 percent of the US commercial bee population disappearing in 2012 alone. Researchers have blamed pesticides and disease for the collapse of thousands of colonies, but no definitive explanation for why so many are dying has yet been put forward. The dire situation has forced governments and scientists to act, creating bee-saving task forces and proposing plans to strap tiny cameras to the little critters to see where they fly. While bees elsewhere in the world are still at risk, Oslo's plan should mean Norwegian bees have a better chance at survival.
Honey bee parasite identified
Saturday, June 27, 2015
A LITTLE-known organism, which attacks the honey bee’s gut and is suspected of contributing to massive hive losses in the Coromandel and other regions, has been identified by Gisborne gene scientist John Mackay.
Ways to combat the parasite from spreading through the country to Gisborne and the East Coast are vital to prevent similar hive losses in this region.
One of the first steps is to identify pathogens responsible for the decimation of bee populations.
During intial testing of samples from the Coromandel, Mr Mackay found fungal pathogens Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis were at the highest levels ever seen.
But a 2013 report had indicated something was different in pathogen activity in overseas hives.
“That, together with a report earlier this year, is what prompted us to develop new DNA tests to identify the possible presence of this new species,” says Mr Mackay.
A DNA test looks specifically for the organism it has been designed to detect.
“We developed a diagnostic associated with a parasite found in Belgium and the USA. It has been around for decades. However, it is only recently that is has been associated with hive losses together with Nosema ceranae; itself associated with major hive losses overseas.”
Nosema ceranae has been associated with Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) — an unexplained phenomenon that has devastated hive populations around the world.
In May, the dnature team confirmed the organism found in the Coromandel bees as Lotmaria passim and reported it to the Minstry of Primary Industries.
Mr Mackay suspects that because Lotmaria passim damages the bee’s gut, this allows Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis to invade the tissue and do more damage. These two pathogens seem to work synergistically.
“In February this year came a report on bees infected with both Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis. It’s much worse for a bee’s life-span having both species than having one or the other.
“Nosema ceranae also affects the bees’ homing ability.”
When bees leave the hive to forage, they cannot find their way back. This could explain why no dead bees were found in or around the affected Coromandel hives, says Mr Mackay.
“Nosema ceranae has been associated with CCD but has also been found in unaffected colonies, as we also found.”
Beekeepers are waking up to the pathogen problem, including the recently-identified Lotmaria passim, says Mr Mackay.
However, when the 400 beekeepers at an apiculture conference in Taupo this week were asked how many had experienced hive deaths with symptoms that matched the Coromandel bee losses, about a quarter of the room reportedly raised their hands, but only one had actually reported the case.
Mr Mackay says reticence over bee losses could be due in part because of competition within the industry.
“If a rival knows I’ve lost my hives they might pinch my manuka site.”
In a Scoop BusinessDesk story, Suze Metherell reports pesticide consultant Don Macleod said the Ministry had only received 12 reports of hive deaths, and the agency was not necessarily able to help because of the uncertainty over the cause of death.
A new set of symptoms alerted scientists to the presence of a possible previously unknown pathogen, wrote Coromandel scientist and commercial beekeeper Dr Oksana Borowik.
Symptoms previously reported by Wairarapa beekeepers were similar to those seen in the Coromandel.
“They all had queens but just a handful of bees. Six weeks earlier these colonies would have been thriving. There were rings of brood that had been capped, but had been chilled and not emerged because of their dramatic decrease. So from 20,000 bees, there were now three to 400 or so in these colonies.
“The next question is of course, what is the cause of what is happening here?”
By May this year, DNA sequencing carried out by Mr Mackay indicated the new organism identity as Lotmaria passim.
British bees have visitors swarming into Expo sculptural hive
AFP Published Tuesday, June 23, 2015 7:50AM EDT
MILAN, Italy - The World Expo in Milan is all abuzz about a giant aluminium hive that hums in harmony with 40,000 bees making honey 1,400km away in Nottingham, England.
Artist Wolfgang Buttress's innovative work is the centrepiece of a bee-themed British pavilion that is pulling in nearly four times as many visitors as anticipated and has become one of the must-sees of the six-month world fair in Italy's economic capital.
Steve Jewlitt-Fleet, the pavilion's deputy director, told AFP that, since its May 1 opening, over 500,000 visitors have come to admire a creation designed to highlight the importance of bees to the environment and showcase scientific research that could help reverse an alarming decline in their numbers.
"It's been a real word-of-mouth success," said Jewlitt-Fleet.
Visitors to the 100m x 20m pavilion follow the dance of a bee through British orchard and meadow landscapes featuring native apple trees and wild heather, buttercups and sorrel, before arriving at Buttress's hive.
As they enter the 43-tonne structure, they start to pick up the amplified hum of the bees in Nottingham Trent University physicist Martin Bencsik's experimental hive in England, where he is using accelerometer technology borrowed from high-tech engineering to monitor what is going on inside.
Accelerometers are highly sensitive devices used to monitor vibrations in rotating machinery, notably in the automobile and aviation industries.
Now mass produced for use in smartphones (they allow automated portrait/landscape display functions) Bencsik uses them to track the evolution of vibrations within the hive over days, weeks and months and translates them as changes of the colony status.
This has enabled him to identify unintentional sounds as minute as the crackling of a single bee walking on honeycomb, and build up a kind of dictionary of bee vibrational pulses.
Bencsik hopes his research will lead to the creation of a simple tool that can be placed in the hive and alert keepers when something has changed, thus saving them the time and effort currently taken up with having to open and check hives individually at least once a week in spring.
"The main advantage is it will enable the keepers to leave the bees that are healthy alone to get on with making honey, and they will also know if something is going wrong," explained the French scientist, who attributes his passion for bees to his father, a keeper of 50 years experience in the Beaujolais wine-growing region.
To enhance the soundscape in Milan, when the bee vibrations reach certain pitches they trigger occasional bursts of specially recorded pieces of cello, piano, guitar and human voice designed to harmonise with the "very meditative, low visceral hum" Buttress discovered when he first visited Bencsik's hive.
"The irony is that bees are deaf, they communicate through vibration, but talking to Martin I saw the potential of using the sounds as a way of reflecting the connection between bees and man," the artist told AFP.
Energy levels in the hive also dictate the colours and intensity of almost 1,000 LED lights which illuminate the Milan structure, which has become particularly popular at nightfall when the visual impact is greatest.
The hive was put together from 169,300 individual components without a single welder being employed.
"Basically it is like a giant Meccano set, a real piece of precision engineering," said Tim Leigh, Marketing Director for Stage One, the British creative construction company which made the hive in 32 layers shipped out to Italy in batches.
Listen to the bees
Stage One, who made the cauldron for the Olympic flame at the London Olympics, won the tender for main contractor, three weeks before it was announced Buttress had won the design competition.
"That meant we were able to help choose the winning design," Leigh explained. "Designers inevitably want to do something as flamboyant as possible but we had to ensure it was buildable on a tight schedule and within what was a relatively modest budget."
Tristan Simmonds, a structural engineer who has helped ensure the stability of giant sculptures by Anish Kapoor and Antony Gormley, and BDP architects were also involved in a project, which required 4,500 hours of technical drawing to ensure all the pieces came together safely and on time.
The goal was to pay tribute to the bee's role as the exclusive pollinator of 70 of the world's 100 most important food crops, making it responsible for almost a third of the food consumed on Earth.
After its stint in Milan, the pavilion is destined to be dismantled and reassembled at a soon-to-be decided location in Britain.
"It would benefit from a background that promotes the countryside and sustainability," said Bencsik.
"That is the message of the pavilion: bees are exquisitely sensitive to the well-being of the environment, if it goes wrong the bees will be the first to suffer so we should listen to them very carefully."
See Also: "Wolfgang Buttress: The architecture of bees" http://www.iconeye.com/architecture/features/item/11141-wolfgang-buttress-the-architecture-of-bees
Environmental Protection Agency Celebrates Pollinator Week
Posted on June 15, 2015
Pollinators are a vital part of America’s economy and environment. Without pollinators, it would be difficult, if not impossible, for our fruits and vegetables to grow. From June 15-21, the Environmental Protection Agency encourages you to celebrate Pollinator Week, a week dedicated to highlighting the importance of bees, bats, birds, butterflies and other pollinators.
EPA is continuing to take action to help protect pollinators, as outlined in the Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators. Here are some our current actions. EPA is accepting comments on its Proposal to Protect Bees from Acutely Toxic Pesticides. On Tuesday, June 23 from 3-4:30 Eastern, EPA will hold a webinar to explain the basics of the proposal. You can access the webinar here https://epa.connectsolutions.com/pollinatorproposal/.
EPA is joining other federal agencies, the National Wildlife Federation, the Pollinator Partnership (pollinator.org) and many more organizations in the Million Pollinator Garden Challenge (http://millionpollinatorgardens.org/) to promote pollinator health.
What can you do to protect pollinators? EPA has tips and resources for the general public, growers and pesticide manufacturers http://www2.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/what-you-can-do-protect-honey-bees-and-other-pollinators.
Spread the word by using #PollinatorWeek in your social media posts and by sharing our social media messages. Retweet us at https://twitter.com/EPA/status/610460326597951488
Learn more about pollinators at www2.epa.gov/pollinator-protection
For more information on Pollinator Week, visit http://pollinator.org/pollinator_week_2015.htm
Morgan Freeman is now a beekeeper
Actor doesn't even wear a veil to protect himself because, clearly, all living things love Morgan Freeman.
Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:32 PM
Morgan Freeman has such a great concern for the plight of the honeybee, that he's now gone and made his 124-acre ranch in Mississippi a refuge for them.
During a media tour for his new film "Lucy," Freeman explained the reasons behind his decision to build his own apiary saying: "I just received, two weeks ago, 26 hives of bees, so I'm very busy... I'm beekeeping...
"There's a concerted effort to bring bees back onto the planet ... We do not realize that they are the foundation, I think, of the growth of the planet, the vegetation... I have so many flowering things and I have a gardener too. Because she takes care of the bees too, all she does is figure out, 'OK, what would they like to have?', so we've got acres and acres of clover, we're planting stuff like lavender, I've got like, maybe 140 magnolia trees, big blossoms," he adds.
Did you read all of that in the smooth-as-butter voice of Morgan Freeman? Because I know I did.
Freeman, 77, is wise to have someone else managing his hives. As the proud owner of two hives, I can tell you it's a bit of work to keep tabs on each one; not to mention the spring and fall honey harvests. Nonetheless, he does visit the bees occasionally — and since all things love Morgan Freeman, he does it even without a protective veil.
"I've not ever used (the beekeeping hat) with my bees," he says. "They haven't (stung me) yet, because right now I'm not trying to harvest honey or anything, I'm just feeding them... I think they understand, 'Hey, don't bother this guy, he's got sugar water here.'"
Read more: http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/arts-culture/blogs/morgan-freeman-is-now-a-beekeeper#ixzz3d9OlRg3n
Honey-based mead may curb antibiotic resistance, say makers
By Ilze Filks
Health | Wed Jun 10, 2015 7:06am
EDTScientists in Sweden are launching their own mead - an alcoholic beverage made from a fermented mix of honey and water - based on old recipes which they say could help in the fight against antibiotic resistance.
Together with a brewery, the scientists who have long studied bees and their honey, have launched their own mead drink - Honey Hunter's Elixir.
Lund University researcher Tobias Olofsson said mead had a long track record in bringing positive effects on health.
"Mead is an alcoholic drink made with just honey and water and it was regarded as the drink of the gods and you could become immortal or sustain a better health if you drank it. It was drunk by the Vikings for example and other cultures such as the Mayas, the Egyptians and it was a drink that was regarded as a very beneficial drink," said Olofsson.
Honey production is key to the research. In previous research published in 2014, Olofsson and Alejandra Vasquez discovered that lactic acid bacteria found in the honey stomach of bees, mixed with honey itself, could cure chronic wounds in horses that had proved resistant to treatment.
They said their research had proven that these bacteria have the power to collaborate and kill off all the human pathogens they have been tested against, including resistant ones. They are doing so by producing hundreds of antibacterial antibiotic-like substances.
What makes Honey Hunter's Elixir different from other types of modern mead drinks is that is uses all 13 beneficial honeybee lactic acid bacteria and the wild yeasts from honey that normally ferment mead spontaneously.
According to the team, commercial honey does not contain these bacteria. Since the honey and water mixture is sterilized before later adding industrial wine yeast, all other life in the honey, including wild yeast, is killed off.
The researchers say the drink contains 100 billion of these 13 different living and collaborating lactic acid bacteria
Olofsson said they believed mead could have been the most efficient historical equivalent to today's antibiotics and they see Honey Hunter's Elixir as a possible way of preventing infections.
"Well, we've seen in our research that the honey bees actually add great flora of lactic acid bacteria in honey so the mead, when produced, is actually fermented by these lactic acid bacteria together with wild yeasts and the lactic acid bacteria can really kill off all the dangerous pathogens that are even resistant against antibiotics. So our thinking is that the mead, when you consume the mead, these (antibacterial substances in) lactic acid bacteria in the drink can actually be transferred to your blood and help you when you are infected with dangerous bacteria or promote health, preventing infections," Olofsson said.
In 2005 Olofsson and Vasquez discovered that many beneficial bacteria reside within honey-bees in a structure called honey crop, which is the organ where honeybees collect nectar for honey production.
As a result, their research has since focused on how this can be applied to functional foods, as alternative medical tools against infections and bee health.
The mead is part of this research which is summarized on the website livingantibiotics.com/
"We will have volunteers drinking this drink and measure different parameters to see if the compounds the bacteria produce could end up in the blood system and for that to cause a prevention or a cure for infections," Vasquez said, adding that more research was needed.
"We don't really know at the moment exactly which kind of infectious disease we could counteract in the future because we need to understand this thoroughly. At the moment we know that the bacteria produce very interesting compounds, a lot of different weapons like antibiotics but a lot of them that collaborate and those weapons or the key in use in this viable bacteria in the future," she said.
If human trials are successful it could help doctors overturn the growing threat of antibiotic resistant bacteria, in both First World countries and also in the developing world where fresh honey is more readily accessible than antibiotics.
In recent years antibiotic resistance has become a critical issue for global health, with an ever increasing number of strains of bacteria developing immunity.
Burpee donates seed packets as part of President's National Pollinator Initiative
By W. Atlee Burpee & Co. June 12, 2015 | 4:30 pm EDT
In support of the President's recently-released National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators, seed giant W. Atlee Burpee & Co. has donated one million Bee and Butterfly Garden flower seed packets to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Interior (DOI) to help combat rapidly dwindling populations of honey bees and other pollinators. The seed packets have been specifically designed to foster bee-friendly gardens and habitats in home and school gardens across the country.
One of every three bites of food eaten depends on pollinators, especially bees, according to a Yale research report (April 2013). Honey bee pollination alone adds more than $15 billion in value to agriculture crops in the United States. The number of managed honey bee colonies in the United States is at a record low of 2.5 million colonies (beehives) compared to 6 million colonies in 1947.
"Given the heavy dependence of certain crops on commercial pollination, reduced honey bee populations directly affect domestic agriculture," said George Ball, chairman and CEO of Burpee. "We believe strongly that home gardens designed to attract bees and other pollinators, such as butterflies, will be hugely successful in reversing this downward trend. We also hope to encourage the next generation of gardeners to nurture the land and the environment," he added.
Distribution of "Burpee's Bee Garden" seed packets is being implemented by the USDA and DOI. The program was launched in April, 2015 with the distribution of seed packets to over 30,000 individuals attending the Easter Egg Roll at the White House, and the Earth Day concert in Washington, DC. To date, seed packages have been distributed by the DOI to educational programs, community and non-profit groups in 24 states, and a further 156,000 seed packets have been distributed by the USDA to 50 state conservationists to provide to requesters in each state. The National Park Service (NPS) has set up an online request/distribution system at www.nps.gov/experiences/pollinatorgarden.htm for youth group leaders and educators to receive seeds in time for planting this season.
Burpee horticulturalists worked in collaboration with the NPS to create a user-friendly seed packet featuring 21 flower varieties that are deer resistant and bloom early and late in the season to extend available nectar for bees, butterflies, moths and birds.
This initiative follows a sweeping Presidential Memorandum calling for immediate measures to "ensure the sustainability of our food production systems, avoid additional economic impact on the agricultural sector, and protect the health of the environment" via citizen stewardship for the conservation of pollinators (from "Creating a Federal Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators," June 14, 2014).
2016 Annual Convention & Trade Show
will be held in beautiful
Albuquerque, New Mexico!
January 5-9 at the Embassy Suites
1000 Woodward Pl NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102
2017 we will join with ABF and have a joint Convention & Tradeshow in Galveston, Texas!
We are excited about both conventions and are working hard on the plans.
We'll have more information soon!
The Bee Understanding Project
Beekeeper Integral to Bee Understanding
As honey-producers, you have more at stake than the average beekeeper when it comes to protecting your hives. A successful honey crop depends on the health of honeybees, plain and simple. That’s why we’re putting together the Bee Understanding project. (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bee-understanding)
Through the Bee Understanding (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bee-understanding) project, farmers and beekeepers, crop advisors and entomologists, pest control applicators and regulators will switch jobs for a day and walk a mile in the other guys’ boots to see this problem from the ground level and develop solutions together.
We’ve recruited former AHPA President Randy Verhoek as our beekeeper, and we hope you’ll be interested to learn more about our work. We’re capturing everything in a series of documentary short films that we will make available to you, and we will work to embed the films in continuing education programs throughout the food chain. Together we can accelerate cooperation, and improve the health of the honey bee.
We want to give you a front row seat. Your contributions can earn you a "Thank you" credit, a "Producer's" credit, or an invitation to our special Honey Dinner, where our executive chef will incorporate 100% North American honey into each and every course. Follow Randy’s story and learn more about the Bee Understanding project at this link. (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bee-understanding)
New Rule Does Not Protect Pollinators
Thursday, May 28, the EPA announced a new rule for foliar applications of acutely toxic pesticides on honey bees contracted to pollinate crops. The new rule will prohibit the foliar application of acutely toxic pesticides to a crop while it is in bloom, and honey bees are hired to pollinate the crop. The EPA states this new rule creates a “pesticide-free zone.” This will create neither a pesticide-free zone, nor protect honey bees and native pollinators from the impact of bee toxic pesticides. This new rule implies needed protection, where it is not needed. Growers who invest in renting bee hives for crop pollination understand the value of honey bees. Specialty crop growers will not intentionally harm the livestock that helps create their crop. Crop pollination contracts have had guidelines written into them protecting honey bees. The EPA is trying to narrow pollinator protection to specialty crop areas only, and throw the rest of the ecosystem “under the bus.” Pollinators must be protected all year long in every setting, in order to be abundant and healthy for the essential pollination moments.
It is the neighboring fields to specialty crops, crops that are part of creating a honey crop, and mosquito control programs that continue to put pollinators at risk. The new pollinator protection statement for this New Rule states:
“It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling. FOR FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF THIS PRODUCT TO SITES WITH BEES ON-SITE FOR COMMERCIAL POLLINATION SERVICES: Foliar application of this product is prohibited from onset of flowering until flowering is complete when bees are on-site under contract, unless the application is made in association with a government-declared public health response. If site-specific pollinator protection/pre-bloom restrictions exist, then those restrictions must also be followed.”
The prohibition still contains “unless” and relates mostly to mosquito control programs and public health emergencies. We can protect public health and protect honey bees. Mosquito control pesticides should be applied when they are most effective at night, when honey bees are not active. This risk and other risks to pollinators are tasked to the State, as they develop individual State Pollinator Protection Plans. These local plans to be developed by local stakeholders may provide “customized mitigation measures” to protect honey bees and native pollinators from pesticide-related risks.
The New Rule mentions other short-comings of protecting pollinators from pesticides, stating the need for additional research on the impact of tank mixes of pesticides with fungicides, specific native pollinator studies, systemic pesticides, insect growth regulators, and “prolonged residual toxicity” of pesticides. While the New Rule will remove the 48 hour notice to move bees when applying neonicotinoid pesticides on crops under contracted pollination services on the Federal pesticide label; some state pollinator plans still contain the 48 hour notice to move honey bees as a mitigation measure. This New Rule will affect current pollinator plans as states cannot create laws that are less stringent than federal laws. EPA is leaving it to the States to create local mitigation solutions when pollinated crops are not the problem.
This New Rule misses the mark completely, as the big problem continues to be tank mixes. Due to a lack of science and scrutiny by EPA, farmers are operating in the dark about tank mixes. Most damage happens to bees from adjacent croplands, and bees not under pollination contracts exposed to tank mixes of pesticides. Farmers are not provided with information on pesticide labels of the synergistic effects of tank mixes. Farmers are not given the information of how to protect the bees, as tank mixes are not regulated. A farmer can perform their due diligence reading the pesticide label of a fungicide, an herbicide, an insecticide, and individually all three products might be slightly toxic or moderately toxic, but combined, the synergism that occurs is unknown. The synergism of tank mixes is apparent when honey bees are killed. This and other exposure routes cannot be addressed through the 15 year cycle of pesticide registration reviews or bee kill incident report data.
A “pesticide-free zone” cannot be called that when only one third of pesticide applications are addressed. The new rule prohibits use of the foliar application of pesticides while the bees are in the blooming crop; but what about the residue levels of systemic pesticides in the soil and water.
Honey bees engaged in honey production are not addressed in this new rule. Fifty percent of the American honey bee stock will be in numerous upper Midwest states in the summer, making a honey crop off of alfalfa, sunflowers, and wildflowers. If this new rule is as Jim Jones, EPA Asst. Administrator states a “function of where the bees are,” then the new rule must protect bees wherever they are located. Pollinators must be protected all year long in every setting in order to be abundant and healthy for the essential pollination moments.
The New Rule will be open for public comment for thirty days. This New Rule will impact seventy-five active ingredients in pesticides (insecticides and herbicides only, not fungicides) and potentially impact one thousand pesticide labels. The active ingredients affected will be those causing acute risk to honey bees on an acute contact basis. New pesticide labels due to this new rule will not be in the marketplace until 2017. The Pollinator Stewardship Council will be submitting our public comment to the EPA docket; and we will reach out to our beekeeping supporters to submit their comments as well, to EPA, and individual members of Congress. For the beekeeping industry to be able to pollinate one third of the American food supply, to be able to produce a honey crop for individual consumption, as well as for the food industry, we must be able to protect our honey bees at all times, in all crops.
EPA’s Proposal to mitigate Exposure to Bees form Acutely Toxic Pesticide Products http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0818-0002
Pollinator Stewardship Council, Inc.
P.O. Box 304
Perkinston, MS 39573
Honey bee behavior altered by insecticides
May 29, 2015 by Scott Schrage
Certain insecticides common to U.S. orchards appear to make honey bees substantially less busy, according to a new study led by UNL entomologists.
Released just days prior to a May 19 White House report calling for greater protection of pollinators, the study suggests that exposure to sub-lethal doses of insecticides known as pyrethroids may reduce honey bee movement and social interaction.
The authors found that honey bees treated with moderate and high doses of a pyrethroid called esfenvalerate moved 61 and 71 percent less, respectively, than untreated bees over a 24-hour span. Bees exposed to high doses of esfenvalerate and its cousin permethrin also spent 43 and 67 percent less time interacting with their neighbors.
Though legislators have put limits on pyrethroid use, the National Agricultural Statistics Service has reported that the insecticides are applied across roughly 1 million acres of U.S. orchards. Growers regularly place honey bee colonies in these orchards, where pollination improves the yield and quality of crops ranging from almonds and cherries to peaches and pears.
While cautioning that the study was conducted under laboratory conditions, lead author Erin Ingram said that behavioral changes similar to those found by the UNL team would have significant consequences if manifested in natural environments.
"The strength of a (honey bee) colony relies on the proper functioning of its members to perform all of the necessary duties, such as foraging for food and communicating with other bees," said Ingram, a doctoral student at UNL. "If bee locomotion, social interaction or ability to feed are impaired by sub-lethal exposure to pesticides, this could potentially impact colony survival or performance."
The researchers gathered data on 384 honey bees by recording them on video and tracking their behavior via a software program. Though this methodology has been applied to the study of animals such as mice, fish and other insects, UNL's Department of Entomology has recently helped establish it as a tool for analyzing bees, Ingram said.
"Animal behavior has typically been studied manually through time- and effort-intensive observation," Ingram said. "With additional work, this system could potentially be developed into an efficient and relatively cost-effective way to examine changes in honey bee behavior in response to low levels of pesticide exposure as part of the risk assessment process."
The recently released White House report addresses several such risks, including insecticides, before laying out numerous initiatives designed to mitigate them in coming years.
"The fact that there is an official strategy for improving pollinator health at the federal level is a great thing," Ingram said. "This strategy addresses a major issue facing pollinator health: the availability of habitat and food resources. While we might not understand all of the disease, pesticide or parasite interactions that are affecting bees, we know that bees need a variety of flowers to meet their nutritional needs.
"Planting pollinator-friendly flowers provides a way for anyone to help out pollinators, and it's a step the federal agencies can take right now to directly impact pollinator survival and health."
Ingram and her colleagues published their study in the journal Chemosphere.
Tiny Parasite May Contribute to Declines in Honey Bee Colonies by Infecting Larvae
May 27, 2015 | By Kim McDonald
Biologists at UC San Diego have discovered that a tiny single-celled parasite may have a greater-than expected impact on honey bee colonies, which have been undergoing mysterious declines worldwide for the past decade.
In this week’s issue of the journal PLOS ONE, the scientists report that a microsporidian called Nosema ceranae, which has been known to infect adult Asiatic and European honey bees, can also infect honeybee larvae. They also discovered that honey bee larvae infected with the microsporidian have reduced lifespans as adults.
Since 2006, beekeepers in North America and Europe have lost about one-third of their managed bee colonies each year due to “colony collapse disorder.” While the exact cause is unknown, scientists have speculated that pesticides, pathogens, mites and certain beekeeping practices have all contributed to this decline. Nosema ceranae, a kind of fungal pathogen spread by spores, is also implicated in colony collapse because it reduces colony health and is widespread.
“Previous research suggested that Nosema ceranae could not infect honey bee larvae,” said James Nieh, a professor of biology at UC San Diego who headed the research effort with graduate student Daren Eiri, the first author of the study. “But this was largely based upon indirect evidence: spore counts in newly emerged adult bees, which typically have low spore counts.”
Because Eiri and his co-authors conducted their experiments with larvae exposed to spores and reared in the laboratory, they said the extent of larval infection needs to be studied further using field bee colonies to determine the true impact of larval infection on colony health. Nieh noted that a study conducted recently by other scientists detected low levels of Nosema DNA in honey bee larvae, suggesting that larval infection can occur in field colonies.
“However, no study had directly investigated whether larvae could become infected with Nosema ceranae,” said Eiri. “Our study provides a direction to continue investigating this question outside the lab and in the field using entire colonies
The UC San Diego discovery may also clarify a mystery. “One puzzling aspect of Nosema ceranae infection is that infection in adult bees usually decreases after medication is given by beekeepers to a colony, but can later resurge,” Nieh said. “Some of this resurgent infection could be due to transmission between bee colonies or to adult bees that have a low, but resistant level of infection.”
“However, our study raises the possibility that brood are also infected. If so, this typically would not be detected for weeks until the emergence of adult bees. Generally, older adult bees are more heavily infected with Nosema. Thus, bees infected as brood may not develop high Nosema spore counts until they are much older adults, further delaying detection.”
Those unanswered questions suggest the impact of this microspordian on honey bee colonies deserves a second look.
“We hope that our study will spur further research into how Nosema ceranae is transmitted and into the potential infection of larvae in natural and managed honey bee colonies in the field,” said Nieh.
The study was funded by grants from the UC San Diego Academic Senate, National Honey Board and North American Pollinator Protection Campaign.
USDA Reminds Farmers to Certify Conservation Compliance by June 1 Deadline
Producers May Need to Take Action to Remain Eligible for Crop Insurance Premium Support
WASHINGTON, D.C., April 16, 2015 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reminds farmers that the 2014 Farm Bill requires producers to file a Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation Certification form (AD-1026) with their local USDA service center by June 1, 2015, in order to become or remain eligible for crop insurance premium support.
Most farmers already have a certification form on file since it's required for participation in most USDA programs such as marketing assistance loans, farm storage facility loans and disaster assistance. However farmers, such as specialty crop growers who receive federal crop insurance premium support, but may not participate in other USDA programs, also must now file a certification form to maintain their crop insurance premium support.
"USDA employees are working very hard to get the word out about this new Farm Bill provision," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. "While many producers will not need to take action, we want to help make sure that those who are required to act do so by the June 1 deadline. We want all eligible producers to be able to maintain their ability to protect their operations with affordable insurance."
Producers should visit their local USDA service center and talk with their crop insurance agent before the June 1, 2015, deadline to ask questions, get additional information or learn more about conservation compliance procedures. Producers that file their form by the deadline will be eligible for federal crop insurance premium support during the 2016 reinsurance year, which begins July, 1, 2015. USDA will publish a rule outlining the linkage of conservation compliance with federal crop insurance premium support. Click here to view a copy of the rule.
The Highly Erodible Land Conservation and Wetland Conservation Certification form is available at local USDA service center or online. When a farmer completes this form, USDA Farm Service Agency and Natural Resources Conservation Service staff will outline any additional actions that may be required for compliance with highly erodible land and wetland provisions. USDA's Risk Management Agency, through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, manages the federal crop insurance program that provides the modern farm safety net for America's farmers and ranchers.
This announcement was made possible by the 2014 Farm Bill, which builds on historic economic gains in rural America over the past six years, while achieving meaningful reform and billions of dollars in savings for the taxpayer. Since enactment, USDA has implemented many provisions of this critical legislation, providing disaster relief to farmers and ranchers; strengthening risk management tools; expanding access to rural credit; funding critical research; establishing innovative public-private conservation partnerships; developing new markets for rural-made products; and investing in infrastructure, housing and community facilities to help improve quality of life in rural America. Click here for more information.
Bee Losses Are Not Sustainable
The Bee Informed Partnership released its analysis of honey bee losses for 2014 yesterday, (http://beeinformed.org/2015/05/colony-loss-2014-2015-preliminary-results/ ) showing beekeepers lost 42 percent of their colonies between April 2014 and April 2015. The Associated Press noted “it’s not quite as dire as it sounds” because beekeepers can split their surviving hives, according to Dennis vanEnglesdorp of the University of Maryland.
Yes, it’s , beekeepers can split healthy hives to make more colonies. But apiaries with 40 percent losses probably don’t have very many healthy hives, and it’s not likely splitting weak colonies will succeed. Logistics aside, what is really missing from this picture is an understanding of the economic investment required to return the number of colonies to previous levels.
This is best understood from the vantage point of the beekeeper, in the context of almond pollination, the beekeeper’s primary economic event. One beekeeper explained it thus:
Do we count downhill such as 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, or do we count uphill such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5? Well, it depends on “where you start,” or “where you are going.”
If we count downhill, a beekeeper begins the year with 2,000 bee hives for honey production. The beekeeper loses some during the summer, and gets the survivors ready for winter. The beekeeper loses more colonies over the winter, and takes the remaining 1,000 good hives to almonds for rent. So, the beekeeper’s losses are 50%.
If we count uphill, the beekeeper knows from past experience, to stay in business he/she needs to rent 1,000 hives to almonds. For the beekeeper to ensure 1,000 hives will be available to rent to almonds, he will need to start with 2,000 hives. This means 1,000 colonies will have to be split. The original colonies will need to be re-queened in order to begin spring with 2000 hives. Therefore, when counting uphill, the beekeeper preparing for almond pollination needs 200% more hives than he/she intends to rent. This costs staff time and hard cash for queens. Splitting a colony also takes away from its ability to make honey, as the field force is reduced.
So where should the counting start? Do we examine the beekeeper’s primary economic event (almond pollination), and count the economic inputs it takes to get there? Or, do we examine the high number counting down towards the beekeeper’s primary economic event (almond pollination), even if this does not capture the beekeeper’s economic inputs?
A true and accurate mathematical analysis will reflect what is actually happening to the bees, and what beekeepers have to do to keep our agricultural system from collapsing. Counting downhill from ivory towers, beekeeping becomes an easy race, but you have to discount how you got to the top of the hill. Counting uphill shows the effort it takes to run the race. Counting downhill or uphill each year shows how the beekeeping race has changed, but fails to capture the big picture and the number of beehives which used to last three years now only last one year.
If other commodities were examined for their sustainability based on a similar survey what would be the response? If half of the cattle died every year, and the cattle industry had to double in size to generate the same number of cattle sales, what would be the repercussions, the regulatory response, and the support offered to the industry?
It has been acknowledged honey bees and other pollinators are integral to agriculture and our wild lands, and an affordable and sustainable food supply. Yet, we are not listening to the bees. Forty to fifty percent losses are not sustainable for either the bees or the beekeepers.
Pollinator Stewardship Council, Inc.
P.O. Box 304
Perkinston, MS 39573
A creature loved by all, it serves a vital function in the terrestrial ecosystem – the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Indispensable for food production, the honey bee is the third most important domesticated animal for humans.
It’s a warning some attribute to Albert Einstein:
If the bee disappears off the surface of the globe, then man would only have four years of life left. Without bees, after all, there would be practically no pollination of flowering plants, and the ecological and economic impacts of that would be dramatic. The Audi Environmental Foundation has been committed to preserving these flying insects for years. Now the foundation is funding a project with an entirely new approach to researching bee behavior: “Vorsprung durch Technik” in the beehive.
An audience with the queen. The Würzburg-based HOBOS project enables fascinating live views from inside an active bee colony.
The future of our planet depends on the intelligent, sustainable treatment of the biosphere by humanity. Playing an active part in species protection starts with knowledge. That’s why the Audi Environmental Foundation has been funding various bee projects since 2011, especially to make nature and our environment interesting and exciting for kids and teenagers.
One of these commitments is the HOBOS (HOneyBee Online Studies) project. This unparalleled online educational platform of the Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg was launched in 2006 by Prof. Dr. Jürgen Tautz, a leading expert on bees. The centerpiece of the project is an active bee colony.
An array of cameras and sensors are used to record the bustling action in and around the beehive in Würzburg, which can be watched on video without disturbing the colony in the slightest. Data on the bee colony, the state of vegetation and the weather is recorded in real time. When do the honey bees swarm? Do bees sleep at night? And what do honey bees do in the winter? Read More: http://www.audi-reports.com/ar2014/stories/bee-ahead/
Monsanto Is in Hot Water - Again
Thursday, 02 April 2015 00:00 By Mike Ludwig, Truthout | Report
This story was updated at 10:20 a.m. EST on April 3.
It's been a tough few weeks for Monsanto.
Late last week, companies "such as Monsanto" were implicated in a watchdog group's petition to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) on behalf of anonymous scientists within the agency who say their research is suppressed when it upsets powerful agrichemical interests.
The allegations enraged the industry's critics, who have been busy touting recent reports linking popular herbicides often used in tandem with genetically engineered crops, or GMOs, to cancer and antibiotic resistance.
Both controversies are renewing calls for tougher restrictions on certain herbicides and mandatory packaging labels for groceries containing GMO ingredients.
"If true, this is a major scandal at the USDA," wrote Gary Ruskin, director of the pro- labeling group US Right to Know, in a March 30 letter to the US House and Senate agricultural committees demanding an investigation. "It is not the proper role of the USDA to engage in a cover up for Monsanto and other agrichemical companies."
READ MORE: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/29992-monsanto-is-in-hot-water-again#
I'll BEE back: Fleets of Terminator-style drones could have artificial brains based on honeybees
· Scientists aim to build robot that thinks, senses and acts like honeybee
· So far team has managed to replicate part of brain that allows bee to see
· Green Brain Project is a collaboration between Universities of Sheffield and Sussex
By Sam Matthew
Published: 09:31 EST, 25 April 2015 | Updated: 11:02 EST, 25 April 2015
The humble honeybee may only be small, but scientists are hoping to use its brain to power a series of futuristic-style drones.
Boffins are currently working towards digitally recreating the cognitive abilities of the Apis Mellifera or European Honeybee.
Their final aim is to build a robot that thinks, senses and acts just like the tiny insects.
The artificial brain is being created by the Green Brain Project, which is a collaboration between researchers from the Universities of Sheffield and Sussex.
One day it is hoped the remote controlled machines could be used to pollinate crops or even assist on search and rescue missions.
'Bees and all other insects are miracles of engineering which we are nowhere near equalling,' Professor James Marshall reportedly told the BBC.
'If we could even recreate a fraction of their abilities in a robot system then we would have made a tremendous advance.'
Building an artificial brain is a complex process and so far, scientist have only managed to clone the part of the bee's brain which allows it to see
To do this they mapped out the brain of the honeybee and recreated it with circuits that fire on and off in an organic brain, Discovery Magazine reported.
The software is then uploaded into the drone's circuitry which enables it to fly around in a similar fashion to the bee.
The projects team now has three quadcopters and one ground robot, each with unique abilities and configurations.
Tests are being carried out in a dedicated flying room based at the University of Sheffield.
In a video footage showing initial tests the drone, powered by the artificial bee brain, can be seen flying down a corridor.
On the Green Brain website it states: 'Since the start of the project, the GB team has setup the lab, built and tested our robots, and begun to demonstrate some sophisticated visual-based navigation and cognitive functions through embodiment.
'Current projects include navigation using the GB models, flight tests of our models with the BeeBot quadcopter, developing a Ground Control Station, initial testing with the chemosensors and more.'
Bees' immunity as they evolved.
By Dave Armstrong
24 Apr 2015 9:29:11 GMT
Bumblebee genomes are less commercial that that of the honeybee, but have just proved to be remarkably similar. What does this say about the immune-related genes within the bee spectrum? We care about our crops and our flowers, the insects that cater to them and the wildlife aspects of bee roles within ecosystems. So therefore this revelation that all bees share a similar resistance to disease gives us great insight into why exactly our pollination problems are building up. The workers for this paper on A depauperate immune repertoire precedes evolution of sociality in bees were Seth M Barribeau of both East Carolina University, US, and the Institute of Integrative Biology in Zurich, Switzerland and dozens of colleagues throughout Europe and the US. They publish in Genome Biology.
2 species of Bombus, B. terrestris(European) and B. impatiens(North American), now show that limited anti-immune response is not limited to the most social insects and could be 105 million years old, when the solitary bee, Megachile, appeared, or even stretch back to the great split from the ants (which also have low numbers of anti-immune responses.) The importance of immune genes is so great that they could even have been associated with these great events in insect evolution.
Fairly obviously, the extreme cleanliness of bees leads to some conclusions as to how lack of immunity is combatted in reality. Hygiene is unusual in animals, and the bees levels of nest maintenance and mutual grooming could both help and hinder immunities from disease, parasitic infections and various effects on colonies based on individual life-history. Sociality is a big plus for cooperative working such as that found in all hymenopterans. The dangers are known to humans and other primates, as we also have the high population densities that create most problems.
In conclusion, the honey bees, bumble bees and even solitary bees are almost the same in restricting their anti-immune genes. However, the current selection processes that operate in these species work against a chemical background of insecticidal clouds and systemic plant dangers. This seems to have produced many different pressures in the honey bees compared to the bumbles. Our concern should be how we can aid the recovery, or even the survival of some of these species. They have suffered from almost every insecticide from organophosphates until the neonicotinoids, and survived! This spread of more and more noxious attacks on pollinators will lead to drops in agricultural production and possibly even loss of whole crops unless regulation arrives on the scene. The days of the cowboy farmer have gone in most countries. Now is the time of the scientist farmer whose knowledge could just see us through to the next phase of agricultural advance. One such example of new developments around a much safer spider venom pesticide was revealed in Saving bees with a new pesticide.
New research provides clues about honey bee decline
May 01, 2015 by Sofiya Cabalquinto
A new study by Heather Mattila, a leading honey bee ecologist and Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences at Wellesley College, published this April in PLOS ONE, reveals that inadequate access to pollen during larval development has lifelong consequences for honey bees, leading not only to smaller workers and shorter lifespans, but also to impaired performance and productivity later in life. For the first time, this study demonstrates a crucial link between poor nutrition at a young age, and foraging and waggle dancing, the two most important activities that honey bees perform as providers for their colonies and as pollinators of human crops. The study was co-authored by Hailey Scofield, Wellesley Class of 2013, a former undergraduate research assistant who will begin a Ph. D program (in Neurobiology and Behavior) at Cornell University in Fall 2015.
The need to study nutritional stress in honey bees has grown pressing in recent years. In 2013, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency named nutritional stress one of the top research priorities for understanding unexplained losses of honey bee colonies, a phenomenon known in the U.S. as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). With bee pollination accounting for over $15 billion in food crops and $150 million in honey annually in the United States alone, bee losses have enormous ecological and economic consequences. If bees vanish, many plants, including vital food crops like apples, almonds, berries and cucumbers, may also be at risk. Researchers believe there may be several interrelated factors contributing to bee decline, including nutritional stress, loss of foraging habitat, pesticides, pathogens, and parasites. These concerns prompted President Obama to form a Pollinator Health Task Force in 2014, an unprecedented action that named studies of the effect of poor nutrition on bees as one of its primary goals.
While a number of sophisticated nutrition studies have been undertaken recently, the Wellesley study is the first to show that nutritional deficits early in life can have far-reaching consequences for adult honey bees, including effects on complex behaviors like foraging and waggle dancing. "Nutritional stress has long been known to shorten bees' lifespan," stated Mattila, "but we've never had such a clear understanding of its impact on the tasks they perform, or known that its effects persist until their last days, even when bees have plentiful food as adults."
The study is also one of the few to be conducted entirely in a natural hive environment, which allowed larvae and adults to function in normal colonies, rather than in the incubators and cages that are more typical of nutrition studies. This unique methodology allowed Mattila, Scofield, and their undergraduate research assistants to observe the bees foraging and dancing in a natural context, activities they would not be able to perform in artificial lab conditions.
Foraging and waggle dancing are especially important to the health of a honey bee colony because they are the key means by which honey bees acquire food supplies like nectar and pollen, and communicate with other bees about the location of food sources and nest sites. When honey bee larvae were raised with a limited pollen supply, as might happen during periods of bad weather or as a consequence of habitat loss or commercial management practices, there were multiple negative consequences. The pollen-stressed bees were lighter and died younger, and fewer bees foraged. Those that did foraged earlier, for fewer days, and were more likely to die after just one day of foraging. Pollen-stressed workers were also less likely to waggle dance than workers that had been well-fed as larvae, and if they danced, the information they conveyed about the location of food sources was less precise. "Their dances were often visibly inconsistent and almost disoriented in the worst instances," said Scofield.
Importantly, nutritional stress interacts with a number of other stress factors, like pesticides and pathogens, which are already known to decrease longevity and impair foraging ability, creating a vicious cycle of poor health and population decline. Nutritional stress is also tied in part to a loss of foraging habitat, which can compound stresses from pesticide use and other commercial practices. Poor foraging and waggle dancing, in turn, could escalate bee decline if long-term pollen limitation if it prevents stressed foragers from providing sufficiently for developing workers. "If poor foraging habitats impose nutritional stress in colonies, then our study shows that the average stressed bee cannot compensate for reduced foraging opportunities by working harder to find food. This likely exacerbates nutritional stress and further limits the colony's ability to overcome food-finding challenges in areas that are no longer suitable for bees," explained Mattila.
The study also suggests that poor nutrition has the potential to undermine colony health and promote collapse. Conversely, ensuring that honey bees have access to diverse and plentiful forage throughout the year could mitigate the potential for collapse. "This means keeping bees in areas that are bee friendly, green, and full of flowering plants within the normal foraging radius of a colony, regularly checking colonies' food supplies, and providing supplements when natural forage is not available or colony stores are low," said Mattila. "Failure to provide these necessities may impose a legacy of dysfunction on colonies."